Kyrgyzstan vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of

Kyrgyzstan
100.0%
in 2013
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
11.6%
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
24th

Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 100.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 88.4%.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 8.6 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th of 139 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 24.2% 16.1% 8.1% Kyrgyzstan
2010s 66.5% 18.8% 47.7% Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Kyrgyzstan or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Kyrgyzstan, at 100.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2013.
What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Kyrgyzstan and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
88.4%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/kyrgyz-republic/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/kyrgyz-republic/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Kyrgyzstan vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
168 places, 3,169 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed