Europe vs Laos: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk
Europe
51.0%
in 2025
Laos
100.0%
in 2013
Europe rank
2nd
Laos rank
1st
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk over time
- Europe
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 100.0% against 51.0% in Europe, a difference of 49.0%.
That makes Laos's figure about 2.0 times Europe's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 2nd and Laos ranks 1st of 29 groups.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.8% | 100.0% | 48.2% | Laos |
| 2010s | 52.2% | 100.0% | 47.8% | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Europe or Laos?
- Laos, at 100.0% against 51.0% in Europe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Europe and Laos?
- 49.0%, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Laos?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Europe and Laos rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Europe ranks 2nd and Laos ranks 1st of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.