Europe vs Kyrgyzstan: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Europe
51.0%
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
100.0%
in 2013
Europe rank
2nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Europe
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 100.0% against 51.0% in Europe, a difference of 49.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 2.0 times Europe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Europe ahead.
Europe ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 29 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Europe averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.7% | 24.2% | 26.5% | Europe |
| 2010s | 52.2% | 66.5% | 14.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Europe or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 100.0% against 51.0% in Europe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Europe and Kyrgyzstan?
- 49.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Kyrgyzstan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Europe and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Europe ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.