El Salvador vs Southern Africa: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
El Salvador
50.0%
in 2010
Southern Africa
19.0%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
11th
Southern Africa rank
13th
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- El Salvador
- Southern Africa
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 50.0% against 19.0% in Southern Africa, a difference of 31.0%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 2.6 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 11th and Southern Africa ranks 13th of 139 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.0% | 15.5% | 34.5% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 50.0% | 11.0% | 39.0% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, El Salvador or Southern Africa?
- El Salvador, at 50.0% against 19.0% in Southern Africa as of 2010.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between El Salvador and Southern Africa?
- 31.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Southern Africa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2010.
- How do El Salvador and Southern Africa rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- El Salvador ranks 11th and Southern Africa ranks 13th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.