Egypt vs Estonia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Egypt
0.0%
in 2012
Estonia
0.0%
in 2025
Egypt rank
68th
Estonia rank
68th
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Egypt
- Estonia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Estonia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 68th and Estonia ranks 68th of 139 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.9% | 2.1% | 7.8% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 7.0% | 7.0% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Egypt or Estonia?
- Egypt, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Estonia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Egypt and Estonia?
- 0.0%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Estonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do Egypt and Estonia rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Egypt ranks 68th and Estonia ranks 68th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.