Eastern Africa vs Malaysia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Eastern Africa
16.7%
in 2025
Malaysia
40.0%
in 2025
Eastern Africa rank
20th
Malaysia rank
21st
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Eastern Africa
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 40.0% against 16.7% in Eastern Africa, a difference of 23.3%.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 2.4 times Eastern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eastern Africa ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 20th and Malaysia ranks 21st of 29 groups.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.7% | 22.0% | 11.3% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 2.3% | 13.0% | 10.7% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 15.7% | 40.0% | 24.3% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Eastern Africa or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 40.0% against 16.7% in Eastern Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Eastern Africa and Malaysia?
- 23.3%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Malaysia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Eastern Africa and Malaysia rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Eastern Africa ranks 20th and Malaysia ranks 21st of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.