Croatia vs Northern Africa: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Croatia
29.0%
in 2025
Northern Africa
4.0%
in 2025
Croatia rank
28th
Northern Africa rank
27th
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Croatia
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 29.0% against 4.0% in Northern Africa, a difference of 25.0%.
That makes Croatia's figure about 7.2 times Northern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Northern Africa ahead.
Croatia ranks 28th and Northern Africa ranks 27th of 139 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.9% | 7.3% | 0.6% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 18.0% | 5.1% | 12.9% | Croatia |
| 2020s | 29.0% | 4.0% | 25.0% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Croatia or Northern Africa?
- Croatia, at 29.0% against 4.0% in Northern Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Croatia and Northern Africa?
- 25.0%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Northern Africa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Northern Africa rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Croatia ranks 28th and Northern Africa ranks 27th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.