Belgium vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Belgium
63.0%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
60.0%
in 2025
Belgium rank
9th
Zimbabwe rank
10th
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Belgium
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 63.0% against 60.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Belgium ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 139 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.5% | 30.0% | 3.5% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 27.6% | 27.0% | 0.6% | Belgium |
| 2020s | 45.7% | 32.7% | 13.0% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Belgium or Zimbabwe?
- Belgium, at 63.0% against 60.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 3.0%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Belgium ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.