Belgium vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of

Belgium
63.0%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
11.6%
in 2025
Belgium rank
9th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
24th

Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time

  • Belgium
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 63.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 51.4%.

That makes Belgium's figure about 5.4 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 9th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th of 139 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 47.7% 16.1% 31.6% Belgium
2010s 36.3% 19.8% 16.6% Belgium
2020s 63.0% 11.2% 51.8% Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Belgium or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Belgium, at 63.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Belgium and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
51.4%, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
Belgium ranks 9th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/belgium/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/belgium/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Belgium vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
168 places, 3,169 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed