Belarus vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of

Belarus
100.0%
in 2012
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
11.6%
in 2025
Belarus rank
1st
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
4th

Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time

  • Belarus
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 100.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 88.4%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 8.6 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 1st and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 119 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 17.0% 83.0% Belarus
2010s 100.0% 17.0% 83.0% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Belarus or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Belarus, at 100.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2012.
What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Belarus and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
88.4%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
How do Belarus and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
Belarus ranks 1st and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/belarus/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/belarus/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Belarus vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
158 places, 2,975 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed