Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Belarus
100.0%
in 2012
Kyrgyzstan
100.0%
in 2013
Belarus rank
1st
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 139 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 31.4% | 68.6% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 55.3% | 44.7% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2012.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Belarus ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.