Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Viet Nam: Proportion of the target population who received

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
34.0%
in 2024
Viet Nam
95.0%
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
37th
Viet Nam rank
36th

Proportion of the target population who received over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Viet Nam
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 95.0% against 34.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 61.0%.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 2.8 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th and Viet Nam ranks 36th of 37 groups.

Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 10.3% 70.3% 60.0% Viet Nam
2010s 12.0% 91.6% 79.6% Viet Nam
2020s 34.2% 88.0% 53.8% Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of the target population who received, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 95.0% against 34.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of the target population who received between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Viet Nam?
61.0%, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Viet Nam?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Viet Nam rank globally for proportion of the target population who received?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th and Viet Nam ranks 36th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Viet Nam: Proportion of the target population who received. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-target-population-who-received-measles-containing-vaccine-second-dose/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-target-population-who-received-measles-containing-vaccine-second-dose/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Viet Nam: Proportion of the target population who received</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
230 places, 4,598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed