Mongolia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Proportion of the target population who received

Mongolia
95.0%
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
34.0%
in 2024
Mongolia rank
36th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
37th

Proportion of the target population who received over time

  • Mongolia
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 95.0% against 34.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 61.0%.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.8 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 36th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th of 193 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2000s 94.6% 6.4% 88.2% Mongolia
2010s 97.8% 12.0% 85.8% Mongolia
2020s 94.8% 34.2% 60.6% Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of the target population who received, Mongolia or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Mongolia, at 95.0% against 34.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of the target population who received between Mongolia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
61.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Mongolia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for proportion of the target population who received?
Mongolia ranks 36th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Proportion of the target population who received. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-target-population-who-received-measles-containing-vaccine-second-dose/mongolia/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-target-population-who-received-measles-containing-vaccine-second-dose/mongolia/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Mongolia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Proportion of the target population who received</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
230 places, 4,598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed