Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of the target population who received

Iceland
98.0%
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
65.0%
in 2024
Iceland rank
14th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
15th

Proportion of the target population who received over time

  • Iceland
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 98.0% against 65.0% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 33.0%.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 14th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 165 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 92.3% 11.6% 80.7% Iceland
2010s 93.9% 26.7% 67.2% Iceland
2020s 74.0% 56.4% 17.6% Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of the target population who received, Iceland or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Iceland, at 98.0% against 65.0% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of the target population who received between Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
33.0%, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for proportion of the target population who received?
Iceland ranks 14th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of the target population who received. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-target-population-who-received-measles-containing-vaccine-second-dose/iceland/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-target-population-who-received-measles-containing-vaccine-second-dose/iceland/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of the target population who received</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
219 places, 4,366 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed