Central Asia vs Tonga: Proportion of the target population who received
Central Asia
97.0%
in 2024
Tonga
99.0%
in 2024
Central Asia rank
1st
Tonga rank
1st
Proportion of the target population who received over time
- Central Asia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 99.0% against 97.0% in Central Asia, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 1st of 31 groups.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.3% | 98.1% | 17.9% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 96.5% | 97.8% | 1.3% | Tonga |
| 2020s | 97.4% | 99.0% | 1.6% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of the target population who received, Central Asia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 99.0% against 97.0% in Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of the target population who received between Central Asia and Tonga?
- 2.0%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Tonga?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Central Asia and Tonga rank globally for proportion of the target population who received?
- Central Asia ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 1st of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.