Armenia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Proportion of the target population who received

Armenia
95.0%
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
34.0%
in 2024
Armenia rank
36th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
37th

Proportion of the target population who received over time

  • Armenia
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 95.0% against 34.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 61.0%.

That makes Armenia's figure about 2.8 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 36th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th of 193 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2000s 93.2% 6.4% 86.8% Armenia
2010s 96.9% 12.0% 84.9% Armenia
2020s 94.6% 34.2% 60.4% Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of the target population who received, Armenia or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Armenia, at 95.0% against 34.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of the target population who received between Armenia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
61.0%, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for proportion of the target population who received?
Armenia ranks 36th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 37th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Proportion of the target population who received. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-target-population-who-received-measles-containing-vaccine-second-dose/armenia/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-target-population-who-received-measles-containing-vaccine-second-dose/armenia/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Armenia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Proportion of the target population who received</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
230 places, 4,598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed