Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of
Belgium
97.0%
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
75.0%
in 2024
Belgium rank
32nd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
31st
Proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of over time
- Belgium
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 97.0% against 75.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 22.0%.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 31st of 209 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.5% | 59.4% | 37.1% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 98.3% | 71.1% | 27.2% | Belgium |
| 2020s | 97.8% | 73.4% | 24.4% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of, Belgium or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Belgium, at 97.0% against 75.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of between Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 22.0%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of?
- Belgium ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 31st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3) vaccine (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.