Mauritius vs Namibia: Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction
Mauritius
100.0%
in 2025
Namibia
100.0%
in 2025
Mauritius rank
1st
Namibia rank
1st
Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 1st of 151 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 75.8% | 24.2% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 76.0% | 24.0% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 1st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.