Madagascar vs Namibia: Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction
Madagascar
100.0%
in 2012
Namibia
100.0%
in 2025
Madagascar rank
1st
Namibia rank
1st
Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction over time
- Madagascar
- Namibia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 1st of 151 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.0% | 100.0% | 76.0% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction, Madagascar or Namibia?
- Madagascar, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Namibia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction between Madagascar and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do Madagascar and Namibia rank globally for proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction?
- Madagascar ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 1st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.