Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction
Hungary
55.0%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
56.0%
in 2025
Hungary rank
70th
Sri Lanka rank
69th
Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction over time
- Hungary
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 56.0% against 55.0% in Hungary, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Hungary ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 69th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.6% | 14.2% | 58.4% | Hungary |
| 2010s | 82.4% | 39.2% | 43.2% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 55.0% | 59.7% | 4.7% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction, Hungary or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 56.0% against 55.0% in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction between Hungary and Sri Lanka?
- 1.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Sri Lanka rank globally for proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction?
- Hungary ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 69th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.