Faroe Islands vs Hungary: Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction
Faroe Islands
50.0%
in 2025
Hungary
55.0%
in 2025
Faroe Islands rank
72nd
Hungary rank
70th
Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction over time
- Faroe Islands
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 55.0% against 50.0% in Faroe Islands, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hungary ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 72nd and Hungary ranks 70th of 151 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 71.2% | 71.2% | Hungary |
| 2010s | 62.5% | 79.2% | 16.8% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 50.0% | 55.7% | 5.7% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction, Faroe Islands or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 55.0% against 50.0% in Faroe Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction between Faroe Islands and Hungary?
- 5.0%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Hungary?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Faroe Islands and Hungary rank globally for proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction?
- Faroe Islands ranks 72nd and Hungary ranks 70th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.