Congo vs Nauru: Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport
Congo
102.95 million p km
in 2024
Nauru
122.15 million p km
in 2024
Congo rank
152nd
Nauru rank
149th
Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport over time
- Congo
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 122.15 million p km against 102.95 million p km in Congo, a difference of 19.20 million p km.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 152nd and Nauru ranks 149th of 170 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 357.42 million p km | 120.43 million p km | 236.99 million p km | Congo |
| 2020s | 84.71 million p km | 58.97 million p km | 25.74 million p km | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport, Congo or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 122.15 million p km against 102.95 million p km in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport between Congo and Nauru?
- 19.20 million p km, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nauru?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Nauru rank globally for passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport?
- Congo ranks 152nd and Nauru ranks 149th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.