China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ethiopia: Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
5.56 billion p km
in 2024
Ethiopia
58.24 billion p km
in 2024
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
37th
Ethiopia rank
36th

Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Ethiopia
020.0B40.0B60.0B201720202024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 58.24 billion p km against 5.56 billion p km in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 52.68 billion p km.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 10.5 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 37th and Ethiopia ranks 36th of 38 groups.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Ethiopia Difference Ahead
2010s 5.35 billion p km 40.92 billion p km 35.57 billion p km Ethiopia
2020s 2.55 billion p km 32.18 billion p km 29.63 billion p km Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 58.24 billion p km against 5.56 billion p km in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ethiopia?
52.68 billion p km, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ethiopia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ethiopia rank globally for passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 37th and Ethiopia ranks 36th of 38 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ethiopia: Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/passenger-volume-passenger-kilometres-by-mode-of-transport/china-macao-special-administrative-region/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/passenger-volume-passenger-kilometres-by-mode-of-transport/china-macao-special-administrative-region/ethiopia/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ethiopia: Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport
Unit
p km
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
208 places, 1,434 data points, 2017–2024
Last refreshed