China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ethiopia: Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
5.56 billion
in 2024
Ethiopia
58.24 billion
in 2024
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
38th
Ethiopia rank
36th

Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Ethiopia
020.0B40.0B60.0B201720202024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 58.24 billion against 5.56 billion in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 52.68 billion.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 10.5 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 38th and Ethiopia ranks 36th of 39 groups.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Ethiopia Difference Ahead
2010s 5.35 billion 40.92 billion 35.57 billion Ethiopia
2020s 2.55 billion 32.18 billion 29.63 billion Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 58.24 billion against 5.56 billion in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ethiopia?
52.68 billion, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ethiopia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ethiopia rank globally for passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 38th and Ethiopia ranks 36th of 39 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ethiopia: Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/passenger-volume-passenger-kilometres-by-mode-of-transport/china-macao-special-administrative-region/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/passenger-volume-passenger-kilometres-by-mode-of-transport/china-macao-special-administrative-region/ethiopia/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ethiopia: Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
207 places, 1,427 data points, 2017–2024
Last refreshed