Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Trinidad and Tobago: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 393.25 units per square kilometre against 44.22 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 349.03 units per square kilometre.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 8.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 45 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 0.0685 units per square kilometre | 2.03 units per square kilometre | 1.96 units per square kilometre | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 5.29 units per square kilometre | 180.77 units per square kilometre | 175.48 units per square kilometre | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 28.14 units per square kilometre | 389.57 units per square kilometre | 361.42 units per square kilometre | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 40.72 units per square kilometre | 389.92 units per square kilometre | 349.21 units per square kilometre | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 393.25 units per square kilometre against 44.22 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 349.03 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.