Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Zambia: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
31.85 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Zambia
28.45 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
161st
Zambia rank
162nd

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
  • Zambia
0102030196519942023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 31.85 units per square kilometre against 28.45 units per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 3.4 units per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 161st and Zambia ranks 162nd of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1990s 0.0045 units per square kilometre 0.0061 units per square kilometre 0.0016 units per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 3.22 units per square kilometre 1.92 units per square kilometre 1.3 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2010s 18.86 units per square kilometre 15.38 units per square kilometre 3.48 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2020s 29.16 units per square kilometre 26.54 units per square kilometre 2.62 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Zambia?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 31.85 units per square kilometre against 28.45 units per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2022.
What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Zambia?
3.4 units per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Zambia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Zambia rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 161st and Zambia ranks 162nd of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Zambia: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/zambia/">Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Zambia: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 11,974 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.