Cote d'Ivoire vs Sao Tome and Principe: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
168.56 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
152.6 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
71st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
74th

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Sao Tome and Principe
050100150200196519942023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 168.56 units per square kilometre against 152.6 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 15.96 units per square kilometre.

That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 71st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 74th of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1990s 0.1251 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.1251 units per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 13.43 units per square kilometre 21.5 units per square kilometre 8.07 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 78.09 units per square kilometre 151.99 units per square kilometre 73.9 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 147.22 units per square kilometre 183.94 units per square kilometre 36.72 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Sao Tome and Principe?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 168.56 units per square kilometre against 152.6 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe?
15.96 units per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe?
51 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 71st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 74th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Sao Tome and Principe: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sao-tome-and-principe/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Sao Tome and Principe: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 11,974 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.