Central African Republic vs Greenland: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
3.18 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Greenland
0.1618 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Central African Republic rank
209th
Greenland rank
212th

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Greenland
0123196519932022

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 3.18 units per square kilometre against 0.1618 units per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 3.02 units per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 19.6 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Greenland ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 209th and Greenland ranks 212th of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Greenland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Greenland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1990s 0.0013 units per square kilometre 0.0093 units per square kilometre 0.008 units per square kilometre Greenland
2000s 0.339 units per square kilometre 0.0964 units per square kilometre 0.2426 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 1.95 units per square kilometre 0.147 units per square kilometre 1.8 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 3.02 units per square kilometre 0.1616 units per square kilometre 2.86 units per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Greenland?
Central African Republic, at 3.18 units per square kilometre against 0.1618 units per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2022.
What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Greenland?
3.02 units per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Greenland?
49 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2022.
How do Central African Republic and Greenland rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 209th and Greenland ranks 212th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Greenland: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/">Central African Republic vs Greenland: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 11,974 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.