Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
415.57 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago
393.25 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
31st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
34th

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0100200300400500196519942023

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 415.57 units per square kilometre against 393.25 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 22.32 units per square kilometre.

That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 31st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 212 countries.

Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1990s 11.5 units per square kilometre 2.05 units per square kilometre 9.46 units per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2000s 243.15 units per square kilometre 180.77 units per square kilometre 62.38 units per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2010s 402.7 units per square kilometre 390.13 units per square kilometre 12.57 units per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2020s 416.3 units per square kilometre 388.82 units per square kilometre 27.49 units per square kilometre Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Trinidad and Tobago?
Cayman Islands, at 415.57 units per square kilometre against 393.25 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2022.
What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
22.32 units per square kilometre, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
48 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2022.
How do Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 31st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/trinidad-and-tobago/">Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 11,974 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.