Antigua and Barbuda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
423.14 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
47.44 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
28th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
26th

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0100200300400196519942023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 423.14 units per square kilometre against 47.44 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 375.7 units per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 8.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 43 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 28th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 26th of 212 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
1990s 5.77 units per square kilometre 0.1273 units per square kilometre 5.65 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 173.95 units per square kilometre 5.29 units per square kilometre 168.66 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 361.05 units per square kilometre 27.69 units per square kilometre 333.36 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 419.84 units per square kilometre 42.05 units per square kilometre 377.79 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 423.14 units per square kilometre against 47.44 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
375.7 units per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
43 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2022.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 28th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 26th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/sub-saharan-africa/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 11,974 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.