What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita between Eswatini and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?

0.5822 units per person, with Eswatini ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?

53 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita

Eswatini

1.4 units per person

in 2024

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

0.8178 units per person

in 2025

Eswatini rank

40th

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank

41st

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita over time

Eswatini
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.4 units per person against 0.8178 units per person in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0.5822 units per person.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.7 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1960 it was South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.

Eswatini ranks 40th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 41st of 213 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	South Asia (IDA & IBRD)	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	—
1970s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	—
1980s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	—
1990s	0.0018 units per person	0.0005 units per person	0.0013 units per person	Eswatini
2000s	0.2213 units per person	0.1458 units per person	0.0755 units per person	Eswatini
2010s	0.8031 units per person	0.8614 units per person	0.0584 units per person	South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s	1.23 units per person	0.8527 units per person	0.3735 units per person	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita, Eswatini or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: Eswatini, at 1.4 units per person against 0.8178 units per person in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2024.
What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita between Eswatini and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: 0.5822 units per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: 53 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita?: Eswatini ranks 40th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 41st of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-capita/eswatini/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-capita/eswatini/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Eswatini vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 260 places, 13,039 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.