China vs Peru: Investment in water and sanitation with private participation

China
497.34 million current US$
in 2024
Peru
121.40 million current US$
in 2018
China rank
5th
Peru rank
7th

Investment in water and sanitation with private participation over time

  • China
  • Peru
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199420092024

How they compare

China currently reports 497.34 million current US$ against 121.40 million current US$ in Peru, a difference of 375.94 million current US$.

That makes China's figure about 4.1 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2001 it was China ahead.

China ranks 5th and Peru ranks 7th of 13 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 722.41 million current US$ 50.67 million current US$ 671.74 million current US$ China
2010s 744.20 million current US$ 187.74 million current US$ 556.46 million current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher investment in water and sanitation with private participation, China or Peru?
China, at 497.34 million current US$ against 121.40 million current US$ in Peru as of 2024.
What is the difference in investment in water and sanitation with private participation between China and Peru?
375.94 million current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Peru?
10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
How do China and Peru rank globally for investment in water and sanitation with private participation?
China ranks 5th and Peru ranks 7th of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB), published as Investment in water and sanitation with private participation (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Peru: Investment in water and sanitation with private participation. Statizoid, drawing on Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/investment-in-water-and-sanitation-with-private-participation-current-us/china/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/investment-in-water-and-sanitation-with-private-participation-current-us/china/peru/">China vs Peru: Investment in water and sanitation with private participation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Investment in water and sanitation with private participation (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
23 places, 348 data points, 1987–2024
Last refreshed

The Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) Database records contractual arrangements for public infrastructure projects in low- and middle-income countries (as classified by the World Bank) that have reached financial closure, in which private parties assume operating risk. Investment in water projects with private participation refers to commitments to infrastructure projects in potable water (treatment and distribution, and sewerage collection and treatment that has an active government component) that have reached financial closure and directly or indirectly serve the public. The types of projects included are management and lease contracts, brownfield projects, greenfield projects (in which a private entity or a public-private joint venture builds and operates a new facility), and divestitures. Investments are classified as one of two types: (1) Investments in physical assets: resources the project company commits to invest in expanding and modernizing facilities and (2) payments to the government: to acquire state-owned enterprises or rights to provide services in a specific area or to use radio spectrum. Data is presented based on investment year. Data are in current U.S. dollars.