Lithuania vs Macao: Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count

Lithuania
262
in 2024
Macao
305
in 2024
Lithuania rank
63rd
Macao rank
60th

Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count over time

  • Lithuania
  • Macao
0200400600200120122024

How they compare

Macao currently reports 305 against 262 in Lithuania, a difference of 43.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Macao ahead.

Lithuania ranks 63rd and Macao ranks 60th of 124 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Macao in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Macao Difference Ahead
2000s 31.67 76 44.33 Macao
2010s 442.8 155.5 287.3 Lithuania
2020s 298.4 252.8 45.6 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industrial design applications, nonresident, by count, Lithuania or Macao?
Macao, at 305 against 262 in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in industrial design applications, nonresident, by count between Lithuania and Macao?
43, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Macao?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Macao rank globally for industrial design applications, nonresident, by count?
Lithuania ranks 63rd and Macao ranks 60th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Macao: Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid, drawing on Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-design-applications-nonresident-by-count/lithuania/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/industrial-design-applications-nonresident-by-count/lithuania/macao-sar-china/">Lithuania vs Macao: Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count
Source
Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
136 places, 3,177 data points, 1980–2024
Last refreshed

Industrial design applications are applications to register an industrial design with a national or regional Intellectual Property (IP) offices and designations received by relevant offices through the Hague System. Non-resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of or acting on behalf of a state or jurisdiction in which the first-named applicant in the application is not domiciled. Design count is used to render application data for industrial applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.