Latvia vs Pakistan: Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count
Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count over time
- Latvia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 129 against 97 in Pakistan, a difference of 32.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Pakistan ahead.
Latvia ranks 88th and Pakistan ranks 91st of 124 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 159 | 198 | 39 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 115.7 | 117.7 | 2 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 65.6 | 99.8 | 34.2 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial design applications, nonresident, by count, Latvia or Pakistan?
- Latvia, at 129 against 97 in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial design applications, nonresident, by count between Latvia and Pakistan?
- 32, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Pakistan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Pakistan rank globally for industrial design applications, nonresident, by count?
- Latvia ranks 88th and Pakistan ranks 91st of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial design applications are applications to register an industrial design with a national or regional Intellectual Property (IP) offices and designations received by relevant offices through the Hague System. Non-resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of or acting on behalf of a state or jurisdiction in which the first-named applicant in the application is not domiciled. Design count is used to render application data for industrial applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.