Iran vs Latvia: Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count
Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count over time
- Iran
- Latvia
How they compare
Iran currently reports 132 against 129 in Latvia, a difference of 3.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 88th of 124 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 166.78 | 123.67 | 43.11 | Iran |
| 2020s | 90.2 | 65.6 | 24.6 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industrial design applications, nonresident, by count, Iran or Latvia?
- Iran, at 132 against 129 in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in industrial design applications, nonresident, by count between Iran and Latvia?
- 3, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Latvia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Iran and Latvia rank globally for industrial design applications, nonresident, by count?
- Iran ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 88th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industrial design applications are applications to register an industrial design with a national or regional Intellectual Property (IP) offices and designations received by relevant offices through the Hague System. Non-resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of or acting on behalf of a state or jurisdiction in which the first-named applicant in the application is not domiciled. Design count is used to render application data for industrial applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.