Guatemala vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP

Guatemala
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Guatemala rank
39th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
42nd

Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
000000196019922025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 7.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Guatemala ranks 39th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 42nd of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of gdp, Guatemala or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Guatemala, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2024.
What is the difference in fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of gdp between Guatemala and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of gdp?
Guatemala ranks 39th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 42nd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Guatemala vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,182 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Fixed telephone subscriptions divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.