Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Mauritius: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mauritius
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
15th
Mauritius rank
12th

Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Mauritius
000000196019922025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 3.0 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Mauritius Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
1990s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2000s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Mauritius
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Mauritius?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Mauritius?
38 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Mauritius rank globally for fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Mauritius: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/mauritius/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Mauritius: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,182 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Fixed telephone subscriptions divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.