What is the difference in fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre between Eritrea, The State of and Finland?

0.0431 units per square kilometre, with Eritrea, The State of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea, The State of and Finland?

29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eritrea, The State of vs Finland: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre

Eritrea, The State of

0.5629 units per square kilometre

in 2022

Finland

0.5198 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Eritrea, The State of rank

165th

Finland rank

167th

Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre over time

Eritrea, The State of
Finland

How they compare

Eritrea, The State of currently reports 0.5629 units per square kilometre against 0.5198 units per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0431 units per square kilometre.

That makes Eritrea, The State of's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Eritrea, The State of ranks 165th and Finland ranks 167th of 212 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eritrea, The State of	Finland	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.1961 units per square kilometre	9.27 units per square kilometre	9.08 units per square kilometre	Finland
2000s	0.3334 units per square kilometre	7.28 units per square kilometre	6.95 units per square kilometre	Finland
2010s	0.5167 units per square kilometre	2.29 units per square kilometre	1.77 units per square kilometre	Finland
2020s	0.551 units per square kilometre	0.6723 units per square kilometre	0.1213 units per square kilometre	Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre, Eritrea, The State of or Finland?: Eritrea, The State of, at 0.5629 units per square kilometre against 0.5198 units per square kilometre in Finland as of 2022.
What is the difference in fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre between Eritrea, The State of and Finland?: 0.0431 units per square kilometre, with Eritrea, The State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea, The State of and Finland?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do Eritrea, The State of and Finland rank globally for fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre?: Eritrea, The State of ranks 165th and Finland ranks 167th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea, The State of vs Finland: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/finland/">Eritrea, The State of vs Finland: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 259 places, 13,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

Fixed telephone subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.