Central Europe and the Baltics vs Monaco: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
13.93 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Monaco
20,754 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
1st
Monaco rank
1st

Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Monaco
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 20,754 units per square kilometre against 13.93 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 20,740 units per square kilometre.

That makes Monaco's figure about 1,489.9 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 45 groups.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Monaco Difference Ahead
1960s 2.2 units per square kilometre 2,960 units per square kilometre 2,958 units per square kilometre Monaco
1970s 5.19 units per square kilometre 4,914 units per square kilometre 4,908 units per square kilometre Monaco
1980s 14.14 units per square kilometre 9,433 units per square kilometre 9,419 units per square kilometre Monaco
1990s 20.57 units per square kilometre 14,490 units per square kilometre 14,469 units per square kilometre Monaco
2000s 27.88 units per square kilometre 16,867 units per square kilometre 16,839 units per square kilometre Monaco
2010s 20.85 units per square kilometre 22,732 units per square kilometre 22,711 units per square kilometre Monaco
2020s 14.83 units per square kilometre 21,261 units per square kilometre 21,246 units per square kilometre Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Monaco?
Monaco, at 20,754 units per square kilometre against 13.93 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Monaco?
20,740 units per square kilometre, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Monaco?
58 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2022.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Monaco rank globally for fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Monaco: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/monaco/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Monaco: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fixed telephone subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 13,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fixed telephone subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.