Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong, China: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.1146 units per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
0.4393 units per person
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
15th
Hong Kong, China rank
15th

Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Hong Kong, China
00.20.40.6196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.4393 units per person against 0.1146 units per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.3247 units per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 3.8 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 15th of 45 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0465 units per person 0.2151 units per person 0.1686 units per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 0.0819 units per person 0.323 units per person 0.2411 units per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.156 units per person 0.5194 units per person 0.3635 units per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.2398 units per person 0.5797 units per person 0.34 units per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.2121 units per person 0.5932 units per person 0.381 units per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.1427 units per person 0.4873 units per person 0.3446 units per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.4393 units per person against 0.1146 units per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2024.
What is the difference in fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong, China?
0.3247 units per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong, China?
50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 15th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong, China: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-telephone-subscriptions-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/hong-kong-sar-china/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong, China: Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 14,482 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Fixed telephone subscriptions divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.