What is the difference in fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre between Gibraltar and Hong Kong, China?

534 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Hong Kong, China?

13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gibraltar vs Hong Kong, China: Fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre

Gibraltar

2,293 units per square kilometre

in 2022

Hong Kong, China

2,827 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Gibraltar rank

4th

Hong Kong, China rank

3rd

Fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre over time

Gibraltar
Hong Kong, China

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 2,827 units per square kilometre against 2,293 units per square kilometre in Gibraltar, a difference of 534 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Gibraltar's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Gibraltar ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 206 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gibraltar	Hong Kong, China	Difference	Ahead
2000s	929.7 units per square kilometre	1,956 units per square kilometre	1,026 units per square kilometre	Hong Kong, China
2010s	1,495 units per square kilometre	2,344 units per square kilometre	849.65 units per square kilometre	Hong Kong, China
2020s	2,200 units per square kilometre	2,795 units per square kilometre	594.74 units per square kilometre	Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre, Gibraltar or Hong Kong, China?: Hong Kong, China, at 2,827 units per square kilometre against 2,293 units per square kilometre in Gibraltar as of 2023.
What is the difference in fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre between Gibraltar and Hong Kong, China?: 534 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Hong Kong, China?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
How do Gibraltar and Hong Kong, China rank globally for fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre?: Gibraltar ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Hong Kong, China: Fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-broadband-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/fixed-broadband-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/hong-kong-sar-china/">Gibraltar vs Hong Kong, China: Fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fixed broadband subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 253 places, 5,086 data points, 1998–2023
Last refreshed: 23 August 2026

Fixed broadband subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.