Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
40
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
1
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010203040201620202025

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 40 against 1 in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 39.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 40.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 24 regions.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 10.25 0 10.25 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 34.83 0.8333 34 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 40 against 1 in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
39, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 24 regions.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-have-legislative-administrative-and-policy-framework-or-measures-reported-2/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-have-legislative-administrative-and-policy-framework-or-measures-reported-2/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
288 places, 2,878 data points, 2016–2025
Last refreshed