Australia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework

Australia
1
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
40
in 2025
Australia rank
2nd
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
2nd

Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework over time

  • Australia
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
010203040201620202025

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 40 against 1 in Australia, a difference of 39.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 40.0 times Australia's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 2nd and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 247 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 0.5 10.25 9.75 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1 34.83 33.83 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework, Australia or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 40 against 1 in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework between Australia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
39, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
How do Australia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework?
Australia ranks 2nd and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 247 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-have-legislative-administrative-and-policy-framework-or-measures-reported-2/australia/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-have-legislative-administrative-and-policy-framework-or-measures-reported-2/australia/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
288 places, 2,878 data points, 2016–2025
Last refreshed