Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
133,628
in 2024
Uzbekistan
1.83 million
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
30th
Uzbekistan rank
28th

Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Uzbekistan
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M201020172024

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 1.83 million against 133,628 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 1.69 million.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 13.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 30th and Uzbekistan ranks 28th of 33 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2010s 232,829 229,671 3,158 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2020s 132,952 461,548 328,596 Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher amount of tracked re-imported environmentally sound technologies, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 1.83 million against 133,628 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in amount of tracked re-imported environmentally sound technologies between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan?
1.69 million, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan rank globally for amount of tracked re-imported environmentally sound technologies?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 30th and Uzbekistan ranks 28th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-imported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-imported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uzbekistan/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
83 places, 1,037 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed