Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2.63 million current US$
in 2024
South Africa
12.98 million current US$
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
25th
South Africa rank
20th

Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M201020172024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 12.98 million current US$ against 2.63 million current US$ in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 10.35 million current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 4.9 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 20th of 33 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 1.01 million current US$ 25.36 million current US$ 24.35 million current US$ South Africa
2020s 2.56 million current US$ 15.39 million current US$ 12.83 million current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher amount of tracked re-imported environmentally sound technologies, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
South Africa, at 12.98 million current US$ against 2.63 million current US$ in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in amount of tracked re-imported environmentally sound technologies between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
10.35 million current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for amount of tracked re-imported environmentally sound technologies?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 20th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-imported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-imported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)
Unit
current US$
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
83 places, 1,037 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed