Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
7.60 million
in 2024
Uzbekistan
20.39 million
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
31st
Uzbekistan rank
30th

Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Uzbekistan
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M201020172024

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 20.39 million against 7.60 million in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 12.78 million.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 37 groups.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2010s 9.50 million 1.65 million 7.85 million Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2020s 9.13 million 6.86 million 2.27 million Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 20.39 million against 7.60 million in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan?
12.78 million, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uzbekistan rank globally for amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-exported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-exported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uzbekistan/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uzbekistan: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
105 places, 1,324 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed