Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
7.60 million
in 2024
Uganda
12.38 million
in 2017
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
31st
Uganda rank
33rd

Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Uganda
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M201020172024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 12.38 million against 7.60 million in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 4.77 million.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.6 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uganda ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 33rd of 37 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Uganda?
Uganda, at 12.38 million against 7.60 million in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2017.
What is the difference in amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda?
4.77 million, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda rank globally for amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 33rd of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-exported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-exported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/uganda/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
105 places, 1,324 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed