Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Rwanda: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
7.60 million current US$
in 2024
Rwanda
21.12 million current US$
in 2022
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
30th
Rwanda rank
30th

Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Rwanda
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M201020172024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 21.12 million current US$ against 7.60 million current US$ in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 13.52 million current US$.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 2.8 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 30th and Rwanda ranks 30th of 36 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 12.74 million current US$ 4.45 million current US$ 8.29 million current US$ Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2020s 9.51 million current US$ 23.25 million current US$ 13.74 million current US$ Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 21.12 million current US$ against 7.60 million current US$ in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2022.
What is the difference in amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Rwanda?
13.52 million current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Rwanda?
13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Rwanda rank globally for amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 30th and Rwanda ranks 30th of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Rwanda: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-exported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-exported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/rwanda/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Rwanda: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)
Unit
current US$
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
105 places, 1,324 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed