Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Zambia: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
72.12 million current US$
in 2024
Zambia
31.29 million current US$
in 2023
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
21st
Zambia rank
23rd

Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Zambia
050.0M100.0M150.0M201020172024

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 72.12 million current US$ against 31.29 million current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 40.83 million current US$.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.3 times Zambia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 23rd of 36 groups.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Zambia Difference Ahead
2010s 114.66 million current US$ 19.95 million current US$ 94.71 million current US$ Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 107.24 million current US$ 18.25 million current US$ 88.98 million current US$ Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Zambia?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 72.12 million current US$ against 31.29 million current US$ in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Zambia?
40.83 million current US$, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Zambia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Zambia rank globally for amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 23rd of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Zambia: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-exported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-re-exported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/zambia/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Zambia: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)
Unit
current US$
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
105 places, 1,324 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed