Georgia vs Pakistan: Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies
Georgia
50.01 million current US$
in 2024
Pakistan
55.14 million current US$
in 2024
Georgia rank
19th
Pakistan rank
18th
Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies over time
- Georgia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 55.14 million current US$ against 50.01 million current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 5.12 million current US$.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Pakistan ahead.
Georgia ranks 19th and Pakistan ranks 18th of 68 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.93 million current US$ | 77.37 million current US$ | 60.45 million current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 34.68 million current US$ | 74.09 million current US$ | 39.42 million current US$ | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies, Georgia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 55.14 million current US$ against 50.01 million current US$ in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies between Georgia and Pakistan?
- 5.12 million current US$, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Pakistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Pakistan rank globally for amount of tracked re-exported environmentally sound technologies?
- Georgia ranks 19th and Pakistan ranks 18th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.