Australia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies

Australia
24.63 billion
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
13.05 billion
in 2024
Australia rank
16th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
4th

Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies over time

  • Australia
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B25.0B201020172024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 24.63 billion against 13.05 billion in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 11.58 billion.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.9 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 16th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 167 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 16.87 billion 13.20 billion 3.67 billion Australia
2020s 20.40 billion 14.45 billion 5.94 billion Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher amount of tracked imported environmentally sound technologies, Australia or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Australia, at 24.63 billion against 13.05 billion in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in amount of tracked imported environmentally sound technologies between Australia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
11.58 billion, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for amount of tracked imported environmentally sound technologies?
Australia ranks 16th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-imported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/australia/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/amount-of-tracked-imported-environmentally-sound-technologies-current-united-states/australia/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
219 places, 2,988 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed